🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the tension triggered by the introduction of a new comprehensive peace framework for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its countermove: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, political struggles are waged: positive announcements are issued from various governments. Considerable effort is allocated on containing specific proposals. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the primary tool for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting missile launches from Russian territory, a capability afforded by up-to-date information. From vantage locations, military aircraft that had been scrambled to counter approaching guided weapons flew past – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by Western partners.

Moments later, Kyiv's missile defense engaged: several firings targeted at a incoming threat. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably delivered by partner states. Every launch creates sudden vibrations, rattling buildings. The brief panic quickly becomes sober acceptance: possibly the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Ongoing Risks

Not long after, a large-caliber weapon engaged a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a rapid response unit – most likely Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the enemy aircraft – it maintained course toward its destination.

With pauses, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv greeted the morning news: seven people killed, damage and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As typically, everyone still continued their routines – enduring hostilities. But those 24 hours encapsulated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a need that regional partners are clearly incapable to fill in the immediate future.

Failed Diplomacy

The detailed framework from Washington generated strong feelings, discussion and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after prior negotiation attempts and bilateral conferences.

Every new proposal from American administration adheres to the consistent cycle: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, effectively counters. They contain the crisis but never actually win the battle. This pattern will, undoubtedly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is tempting to accuse certain parties of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington functions according to a assumption familiar among experienced diplomats: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have been unable to protect through force. The American government believes that it is unrealistic to compel Moscow to surrender the land that it already controls in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The issue is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does little to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the status quo will not shift further in its favour in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are coming close to fatigue. Their incentive to accept conditions that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be numerous efforts to achieve ceasefire, but they will persist as long as Russia's leader remains supremely confident in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, slowly losing lives and land but avoiding a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its favour.

Existing Situation

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: personal goals to mediate resolution and achieve global acclaim, and Kyiv's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not shift toward homefront challenges. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a just a single week to eliminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on previous concepts are approaching, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate certain reluctance to change the course of events, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the foreseeable future, mainly require continued Western support.